Toll Free
1-800-669-8892 or 1-603-569-7988

Meditations on Violence

by Rory Miller, May 22, 2008
Violence is what it is

Violence is what it is

The rhinoceros is a real beast, an animal native to Asia and Africa. It is large, formidable, and familiar to most of us from pictures or visits to the zoo. What do we really know about rhinoceros? Are they grazers or browsers? Do they live in big herds, family groups, or roam the savannah alone? In the movie The Gods Must be Crazy, we learned that the rhinoceros doesn’t like fire and will stamp out a campfire. Is that true? I have no idea. Look at how little we know, and how little we know with confidence, about this beast that really exists and is truly dangerous.

The unicorn derived from the rhinoceros. Over time and distance and by word of mouth, the reality of the rhinoceros slowly changed into the myth of the unicorn. This process has been so powerful that everyone knows many, many facts about the unicorn. It has the beard of a goat, cloven hooves, and a single horn. It kills elephants by impaling and is strong enough to hurl the elephant over its head, yet it can be tamed and captured by a virgin. We know all these “facts” about the unicorn, but there is only one true fact to know:

The unicorn is imaginary.

Unicorns are mythical, yet we know so much about them. The rhinoceros is real and, except for a few experts, we know so little.

There is a parallel between the unicorn and violence. Just as travelers’ tales passing from person to person and place to place and century to century managed to morph the reality of the rhinoceros into the fable of the unicorn, the insular tradition and history of each dojo has morphed a primal understanding of violence into the modern ritual of martial arts. Just as the grey and wrinkled skin of the rhinoceros has become the glossy white coat of the unicorn, the smells, and sounds, and gut-wrenching fear of close-up personal violence has somehow spawned the beautiful cinema of the action adventure movie and the crisp precision of the martial arts. In today’s world, who are the real experts on violence?

The Priests of Mars. The minute you don a black belt, the minute you step in front of a class to teach, you are seen as an expert on violence. It doesn’t matter if you have absorbed a complete philosophical system with your martial art. It doesn’t matter if the art gave you, for the first time, the confidence to view the world as a pacifist. It doesn’t matter if you studied as a window to another age and culture. It doesn’t matter that you have found enlightenment in kata or learned to blend in harmony with the force of your attacker. It doesn’t matter because you are about to teach a martial art, an art dedicated to Mars, the God of War. A MARtial art. Even if somewhere over the years you have lost sight of this, your students have not. You wear a black belt. You are an expert on violence. You kick ass. You are a priest of Mars.

The simple truth is that many of these experts, these priests of Mars, have no experience with violence. Very, very few have experienced enough to critically look at what they have been taught, and what they are teaching, and separate the myth from the reality.

The Super Star. Do you ever notice that weight lifters don’t look like boxers? For that matter, if you watch fencing matches you see a lot of tall skinny guys, Judo matches tend to be won by short, stocky judoka—basically, none of them look like body builders. But action stars usually do. Unless they want to appeal to the goth/techno market, in which case they are really skinny, pale-complected, and wear a lot of black. The idea is the same—pretty sells. In the media world, everything is about attraction. The fighters look pretty, not the gnarled, scarred up, sometimes toothless fighters that I know. The fights look pretty, too—you can actually see the action and even identify specific techniques. They are paced for dramatic content. A movie fight doesn’t end when the hero or villain would naturally be lying in a pool of bloody vomit, clutching his abdomen and gurgling. It ends at the moment the director thinks the audience is hyped and not bored yet.

Even when they try to be realistic, it’s about the spectacle. The very fact that the camera can see what is going on is unrealistic. In smoke and dust and rain and the melee of bodies or the flash of gunfire, the person right in the middle of it can’t reliably tell what is going on.

And the fighting caters to the audience’s idea of fair. It’s almost always a close fight to the very end, won by a slim margin…I’ll tell you right now that as a public servant who runs a tactical team if I ever, ever play it fair, if I ever take chances with my men or hostages in order to cater to some half-assed idea of fair play, fire me. Fair doesn’t happen in real life, not if the bad guys have anything to say about it and not if the professional good guys do, either. I always wanted to see a movie with Conan talking shit in a bar and looking down to see a knife sticking out of his stomach with no idea how it got there.

The Story. Maybe this is a metaphor, maybe it is a model: Things are what they are. Violence is what it is. You are you, no more and no less—but humans can’t leave simple things alone.

One of the ways we complicate things is by telling stories, especially stories about ourselves. This story we tell ourselves is our identity. The essence of every good story is conflict. So our identity, the central character of this story that we tell ourselves, is based largely on how we deal with conflict. If there has been little conflict in the life, the character, our identity, is mostly fictional.

I present this as a warning. You are what you are, not what you think you are. Violence is what it is, not necessarily what you have been told.

You can read more about this subject in Rory Miller's new book "Meditations on Violence".

Rory Miller has served for seventeen years in corrections as an officer and sergeant working maximum security, booking and mental health; leading a tactical team; and teaching subjects ranging from Defensive Tactics and Use of Force to First Aid and Crisis Communications with the Mentally Ill.



COMMENTS

OK, but is the anger useful then ? And what about the concept of non-violence and Mahatma Gandhi ? Isn't the non-violence in the modern society even more fictional ? We really know very little about the nature.
M.B. – July 11, 2008, 8:29 am
Who said anything about anger?
E.A. – January 11, 2009, 1:31 pm
excellent.

i hope i can meet this man someday.

what a great read


shotokan, tang soo do, FMA(arnis, kun tao silit, excrima)


...still learning, always learning, always reading
husqvarna – January 27, 2009, 7:29 pm
dear rory...your book is great...and out of all the book my favorite part is the part where you let the reader what is going on in your head...how u see life..is my favorite part of the book...MARC ANIMAL MACYOUNG told me to get the book...MARC -also a wise/funny-guy spoke nothing but good about you---id like to meet the both of you someday hopefully...i like how u say that all the training in the world does not compare to someone with actual intent on taking your life and your mind and bodies reaction to this....but to anybody who is reading thesE comments======JUST BUY THE BOOK...BUY A FEW ..GIVE EM OUT AS GIFTS...AND WHEN YOUR DONE READING READ IT AGAIN......
DANIEL – March 29, 2009, 12:42 pm



©2014 YMAA | About YMAA | Privacy Policy |Terms of Use | Permissions | Contact Us
Free shipping on orders of $50 or more. Select "GROUND SHIPPING UPS" or "SUPER SAVER USPS" (US Post). Domestic USA locations only.
Close Close