| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Balloo Forum Regular
Joined: 31 May 2006 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 5:52 am Post subject: Justifying injury to opponents |
|
|
| I love Southern Praying Mantis Kung Fu, but I am having a problem with the amount of damage it can do to your opponent. Southern Mantis uses a phoenix fist (one extended knuckle) to concentrate the power of a strike. This causes severe damage to the opponent who receives such a strike. I am debating looking into other styles such as Aikido or Chin Na as a means to end a confrontation with less damage to the opponent. Any thoughts? What would you do? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John the Monkey mind Forum Specialist
Joined: 16 Nov 2009 Posts: 137
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Phoenix fist is used in a lot of ways, if you crack the sternum it wont kill them (probably, could always have a hart condition I guess), pain is not the worst you can do to them. Some Chin Na could really damage them long term if they resist.
Having been on the receiving end of an attack I say ethics come before and after the fight, in victory there is life, if you lose you are at their mercy and I trust my ethics more, I wont stamp on their head, in the UK that is how most fights seem to end. Hint, its not fun being on the receiving end, holding back will cost you and its easy to trip up even without their help, then they will pay you for your consideration. End the fight, go home be happy.
I am a advocate of Karma, if they attack you and get injured its as if you were a wall they hit them self against. Don't blame the wall, never fight unless you have to!
I advise sticking with Mantis as you love it but studying Chin Na as well as more options are good.
As for other styles, why not Taiji, it has a large range of options, look at the Taiji fighting set clip on this site.
Don't get me wrong I admire your compassion but remember it was Buddhists who invented most kung fu. Having the option to really mess someone up hardly means you will.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dvivid Forum God

Joined: 28 Jul 2003 Posts: 1227 Location: Boston, MA
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is a very important subject, and I've seen it discussed frequently in the past year. Since the economy has tanked, there have been more violent encounters than ever.
This recent book suddenly has gained a lot of attention because it focuses on this topic of de-escalating violence:
http://www.ymaa.com/publishing/books/external/little_black_book_violence
 _________________ "Avoid Prejudice, Be Objective in Your Judgement, Be Scientific, Be Logical and Make Sense, Do Not Ignore Prior Experience." - Dr. Yang
http://www.ymaa.com/publishing |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Balloo Forum Regular
Joined: 31 May 2006 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 1:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thank you both for your thoughts. I appreciate your time and ideas. I am going to Minnesota to try another southern mantis class. And I will definitely pick up that book. Thank you again guys. I will probably stick with mantis. In all honesty, that is where my heart is at. I know I will not be the best fighter, I know I may get beaten, but you know what...mantis is where my heart is, and that's really whats important to me. That said, I know mantis is far from perfect, so I will continue to look at other styles and integrate what seems effective to me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Josh Young Forum Guru

Joined: 06 Mar 2009 Posts: 227
|
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aikido is largely derived of Aikijutsu, both can be done in a very deadly manner. Only the later school of Morihei received his developed concepts of avoiding harm, early schools of his used the same techniques in a deadlier fashion.
Chi-na is also loaded with techniques that one cannot safely train in applying because they cause serious injury or death.
Chi-na and Aikido may be bad choices for arts that are less injurious, they may not contain what mantis does, but they can destroy a person nonetheless.
I know only stories about mantis, and the forms I have seen. It looks to be a very nice martial art. I'd love to hear more about it. I think you made a good choice. _________________ http://wujiquan.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yat_chum Forum God

Joined: 05 Nov 2004 Posts: 2264 Location: United Kingdom
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have had a similar dilemma.
http://www.ymaa.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1253 _________________ yijing zhigang
use stillness to overcome movement
Last edited by yat_chum on Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:12 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
joeblast Forum ÜberGuru
Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Posts: 565 Location: CT
|
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hm...
"A good fight should be like a small play...but played seriously. When the opponent expands, I contract. When he contracts, I expand. And when there is an opportunity... I do not hit...it hits all by itself"
I think unless you unambiguously have more skill than your opponent, then the hit is simply what becomes available, if it is indeed serious. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
charp choi Forum User
Joined: 25 Mar 2007 Posts: 7 Location: Uk
|
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 5:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Southern Mantis is a very direct system.
There are numerous different systems (Chu Gar, Chow Gar, Kwongsai Jook Lum, Dit Ngau (Iron ox) and Chuka Shaolin).
The phoenix eye is prominent in all of them although they do have their differences. It also has chin-na (kumla in cantonese) techniques in the system as well as throws etc. _________________ nei but loy, ngor but fat |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|